|
|
|
@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ The probabalistic model could then be used to answer various questions, includin
|
|
|
|
It would also be straightforward to develop simulations from this approach, as the probabilities are right there.
|
|
|
|
It would also be straightforward to develop simulations from this approach, as the probabilities are right there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Estimation Strategy
|
|
|
|
# Estimation Strategy
|
|
|
|
Probably use a non-parametric bayesian approach to estimating the probability densities?
|
|
|
|
Probably use a non-parametric bayesian approach to estimating the probability densities.
|
|
|
|
[AbrantesMetz-Adams-and-Metz] use a hazards model.
|
|
|
|
[[AbrantesMetz-Adams-and-Metz]] use a mixed state proportional hazards model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Phase Completion Probabilities:
|
|
|
|
## Phase Completion Probabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ I may also include the combined phases
|
|
|
|
- P(completing combined phase 1-2 & duration phase 1-2 | Data)
|
|
|
|
- P(completing combined phase 1-2 & duration phase 1-2 | Data)
|
|
|
|
- P(completing combined phase 2-2 & duration phase 2-3 | Data & transitioned to phase 2 & duration phase 1)
|
|
|
|
- P(completing combined phase 2-2 & duration phase 2-3 | Data & transitioned to phase 2 & duration phase 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think there might be a way of condensing these using "phase endpoints" as a marker, and not the phase type itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Phase Transition Probabilities:
|
|
|
|
## Phase Transition Probabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goal is to estimate
|
|
|
|
The goal is to estimate
|
|
|
|
|