Kessler region depends on loss functions
parent
751f4fe9c2
commit
01426f1080
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||||||
|
\documentclass[../Main.tex]{subfiles}
|
||||||
|
\graphicspath{{\subfix{Assets/img/}}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
Given the definition of kessler syndrome and the law of debris above, we can now
|
||||||
|
explicitly describe the proto-kessler region.
|
||||||
|
\begin{align}
|
||||||
|
\epsilon < -\delta D_t + g(D_t) + \gamma \sum^n_{j=1} l^i(\{s^j_t\},D_t) + \Gamma \sum^n_{j=1} \{x^j_t\}
|
||||||
|
\end{align}
|
||||||
|
As being in the proto-kessler region is a prerequesit to being in the kessler region, we see that
|
||||||
|
the kessler region depends on the collision rates of the constellation operators.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Although this is a straightforward result, I have not found it in any of the models I've examined so far.
|
||||||
|
I suspect it will impact optimal pigouvian taxation, but of course, I need to verify this.
|
||||||
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue