You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
61 lines
3.0 KiB
Org Mode
61 lines
3.0 KiB
Org Mode
* 2025
|
|
** 2025-W03
|
|
*** 2025-01-15 Wednesday
|
|
**** DONE Push work to overleaf
|
|
DEADLINE: <2025-01-15 Wed> CLOSED: [2025-01-20 Mon 11:46]
|
|
*** 2025-01-17 Friday
|
|
**** DONE Fix JMP based on Tom's Suggestions and send to committee
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 10:11]
|
|
***** DONE Get references working properly
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 09:58]
|
|
- setup author date format
|
|
- fix references, add to Overleaf version
|
|
***** DONE fix issues
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 09:58]
|
|
*** 2025-01-18 Saturday
|
|
**** DONE Decide if this section needs added
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 09:58]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/11_intro_and_lit.tex::45]]]]
|
|
nope
|
|
**** RECINDED Update citations in lit review section.
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-20 Mon 11:47]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/05_LitReview.tex::25]]]]
|
|
Realized that this was readded by mistake. I integrated lit review into intro in 11
|
|
**** RECINDED Ask CLAUDE to help Lit review flow better.
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-20 Mon 11:47]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/05_LitReview.tex::25]]]]
|
|
Realized that this was readded by mistake. I integrated lit review into intro in 11
|
|
**** DONE Rearrange the lit review.
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-20 Mon 11:47]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/05_LitReview.tex::25]]]]
|
|
Realized that this was readded by mistake. I integrated lit review into intro in 11
|
|
** 2025-W04
|
|
*** 2025-01-20 Monday
|
|
**** DONE get a citation for the AACT project
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 09:55]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/10_CausalStory.tex::114]]]]
|
|
*** 2025-01-23 Thursday
|
|
**** DONE Pickup citation fixes here
|
|
CLOSED: [2025-01-29 Wed 09:55]
|
|
[[[[file:/home/will/research/phd_deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/06_Results.tex::174]]]]
|
|
** 2025-W05
|
|
*** 2025-01-29 Wednesday
|
|
**** TODO Review JMP, list areas that need rewritten.
|
|
***** TODO Read Backward
|
|
Identify poorly written portions (incomplete sentences and paragraphs) and what I was trying to communicate.
|
|
|
|
**** TODO Redo analysis using "Recruitng" as the base status
|
|
|
|
The goal is to get the $\beta$'s for active, not recruitng.
|
|
**** TODO Rerun analysis with correct base
|
|
[[[[file:/mnt/backups/home/dad/research/PhD_Deliverables/JobMarketPaper/Paper/sections/06_Results.tex::204]]]]
|
|
The natural comparison I want to make is against the Recruting status.
|
|
Do I want to redo this so that I can read that directly?
|
|
It shouldn't affect the $\delta_p$ analysis, but this could probably use it.
|
|
YES, THIS UPDATE NEEDS TO HAPPEN. The base needs to be ``active not recruiting.''
|
|
|
|
So the plan is to set ``Active, not recruiting'' as the base condition, then
|
|
measure the effect when that is chagned to ``Recruiting''.
|
|
If that is negative, then extending recruiting reduces the probability of
|
|
termination.
|