Finally got all the needed images correct.

Adjusted directory to make it easier to find images.

Paper/sections/06_Results.tex

@@ -26,21 +26,21 @@ the correlation (measured at $0.34$) is apparent.
 
 
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/HistTrialDurations_Faceted}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/trials_details/HistTrialDurations_Faceted}
     \todo{Replace this graphic with the histogram of trial durations}
     \caption{Histograms of Trial Durations}
     \label{fig:trial_durations}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/HistSnapshots}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/trials_details/HistSnapshots}
     \todo{Replace this graphic with the histogram of snapshots}
     \caption{Histogram of the count of Snapshots}
     \label{fig:snapshot_counts}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/SnapshotsVsDurationVsTermination}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/trials_details/SnapshotsVsDurationVsTermination}
     \todo{Replace this graphic with the scatterplot comparing durations and snapshots}
     \caption{Scatterplot comparing the Count of Snapshots and Trial Duration}
     \label{fig:snapshot_counts}
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ disease categories had a single trial represented while others were
 not represented at all.
 
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/CategoryCounts}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/trials_details/CategoryCounts}
     \caption{Bar chart of trials by ICD-10 categories}
     \label{fig:barchart_idc_categories}
 \end{figure}
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ keeping enrollment open.
 
 
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/DirectEffects/p_delay_intervention_distdiff_boxplot}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/dist_diff_analysis/p_delay_intervention_distdiff_boxplot}
     \todo{Replace this graphic with the histdiff with boxplot}
     \small{
         Values near 1 indicate a near perfect increase in the probability 
@@ -168,78 +168,40 @@ Three points lead me to believe this:
     \item There are few trials available, particularly among some specific 
         ICD-10 categories.
 \end{itemize}
-% NOTE: maybe change order to be ebfmi, group hist-diff or distdiff, tail width, then data size.
 %           - take a look at beta values and then discuss if that lines up with results from dist-diff by group. 
 %       - My initial thought is that there is not enough data/too uncertain. I think this because it happens for most/all of the categories.
 % - 
 % - 
 % - 
-% - 
-Overally it is hard to escape the result that more data is needed, across
-many, if not all, of the disease categories.
-
-
-
-% The probability mass associated with a each 10 percentage point change are in table \ref{tab:regimes}
-% \begin{table}[H]
-% \caption{Regimes and associated probability masses}\label{tab:regimes}
-% \begin{center}
-% \begin{tabular}[c]{l|l}
-% 	\hline
-% 	\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Interval}} & 
-% 	\multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{Probability Mass}} \\
-% 	\hline
-% 	$[,]$ & b \\
-% 	$[,]$ & b \\
-% 	$[,]$ & b \\
-% 	$[,]$ & b \\
-% 	$[,]$ & b \\
-% 	\hline
-% \end{tabular}
-% \end{center}
-% \end{table}
+Overally it is hard to escape the conclusion that more data is needed across
+many -- if not all -- of the disease categories.
+
+
 
 Figure \ref{fig:pred_dist_dif_delay2} shows how this overall
 result comes from different disease categories.
 \begin{figure}[H]
-    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/DirectEffects/p_delay_intervention_distdiff_by_group}
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/dist_diff_analysis/p_delay_intervention_distdiff_by_group}
     \caption{Distribution of Predicted differences by Disease Group}
     \label{fig:pred_dist_dif_delay2}
 \end{figure}
 
 
+\subsection{Secondary Results}
 
+% Examine beta parameters 
+% - 
+% - 
+% - 
+% - 
+% - 
 
-% Although it is not causally identified due to population interactions,
-% we can examine the direct effect from adding a single generic competitior drug
-% and how the similar result decomposes very differently.
-% This is shown just as a contrast to the enrollment results.
-% Figure 
-% \label{fig:pred_dist_diff_generic}
-% shows a very similar result with roughly the same regimes,
-% while 
-% \label{fig:pred_dist_dif_generic2}
-% shows that this breakdown is different.
-% \todo{
-%     Consider moving these to an appendix as they are 
-%     just additions at this point.
-% }
-%
-% \begin{figure}[H]
-%     \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/current/pred_dist_diff-generic}
-%     \caption{
-%         Distribution of Predicted Differences for one additional generic 
-%         competitor
-%     }
-%     \label{fig:pred_dist_diff_generic}
-% \end{figure}
-%
-% \begin{figure}[H]
-%     \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/current/pred_dist_diff-generic-group}
-%     \caption{}
-%     \label{fig:pred_dist_dif_generic2}
-% \end{figure}
-%
+\begin{figure}[H]
+    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../assets/img/betas/parameter_across_groups/parameters_12_status_ANR}
+    \caption{Distribution of parameters associated with ``Active, not recruiting'' status, by ICD-10 Category}
+    \label{fig:parameters_ANR_by_group}
+\end{figure}
+% - 
 
 
 \end{document}