commmented out some lit that doesn't go in the intro.

claude_rewrite
will king 1 year ago
parent a3186c280b
commit 0a9c572482

@ -195,112 +195,112 @@ and
\ref{SEC:Conclusion} \ref{SEC:Conclusion}
respectively respectively
\subsection{Market incentives and drug development} % \subsection{Market incentives and drug development}
%%%%%%%%% What do we know about drug development incentives? % %%%%%%%%% What do we know about drug development incentives?
%
\cite{dranove_DoesConsumer_2022} use the implementation of Medicare part D % \cite{dranove_DoesConsumer_2022} use the implementation of Medicare part D
to examine whether the production of novel or follow up drugs increases during % to examine whether the production of novel or follow up drugs increases during
the following 15 years. % the following 15 years.
They find that when Medicare part D was implemented -- increasing senior % They find that when Medicare part D was implemented -- increasing senior
citizens' ability to pay for drugs -- there was a (delayed) increase % citizens' ability to pay for drugs -- there was a (delayed) increase
in drug development, with effects concentrated among compounds that were least % in drug development, with effects concentrated among compounds that were least
innovative according to their classification of innovations. % innovative according to their classification of innovations.
They suggest that this is due to financial risk management, as novel % They suggest that this is due to financial risk management, as novel
pharmaceuticals have a higher probability of failure compared to the less novel % pharmaceuticals have a higher probability of failure compared to the less novel
follow up development. % follow up development.
This is what leads risk-adverse companies to prefer follow up development. % This is what leads risk-adverse companies to prefer follow up development.
%
%
% Acemoglu and Linn % % Acemoglu and Linn
% - Market size in innovation % % - Market size in innovation
% - Exogenous demographic trends has a large impact on the entry of non-generic drugs and new molecular entitites. % % - Exogenous demographic trends has a large impact on the entry of non-generic drugs and new molecular entitites.
On the side of market analysis, % On the side of market analysis,
\citeauthor{acemoglu_market_2004} % \citeauthor{acemoglu_market_2004}
(\citeyear{acemoglu_market_2004}) % (\citeyear{acemoglu_market_2004})
used exogenous deomographics changes to show that the % used exogenous deomographics changes to show that the
entry of novel compounds is highly driven by the underlying aged population. % entry of novel compounds is highly driven by the underlying aged population.
They estimate that a 1\% increase in applicable demographics increase the % They estimate that a 1\% increase in applicable demographics increase the
entry of new drugs by 6\%, mostly concentrated among generics. % entry of new drugs by 6\%, mostly concentrated among generics.
Among non-generics, a 1\% increase in potential market size % Among non-generics, a 1\% increase in potential market size
(as measured by demographic groups) leads to a 4\% increase in novel therapies. % (as measured by demographic groups) leads to a 4\% increase in novel therapies.
%
% Gupta % % Gupta
% - Inperfect intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry % % - Inperfect intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry
\cite{gupta_OneProduct_2020} discovered that uncertainty around which patents % \cite{gupta_OneProduct_2020} discovered that uncertainty around which patents
might apply to a novel drug causes a delay in the entry of generics after % might apply to a novel drug causes a delay in the entry of generics after
the primary patent has expired. % the primary patent has expired.
She found that this delay in delivery is around 3 years. % She found that this delay in delivery is around 3 years.
%
% Agarwal and Gaule 2022 % % Agarwal and Gaule 2022
% - Retrospective on impact from COVID-19 pandemic % % - Retrospective on impact from COVID-19 pandemic
% Not in this version % % Not in this version
%
\subsection{Understanding Failures in Drug Development} % \subsection{Understanding Failures in Drug Development}
%
% DISCUSS: Different types of failures % % DISCUSS: Different types of failures
There are myriad of reasons that a drug candidate may not make it to market, % There are myriad of reasons that a drug candidate may not make it to market,
regardless of it's novelty or known safety. % regardless of it's novelty or known safety.
In this work, I focus on the failure of individual clinical trials, but the % In this work, I focus on the failure of individual clinical trials, but the
categories of failure apply to the individual trials as well as the entire % categories of failure apply to the individual trials as well as the entire
drug development pipeline. % drug development pipeline.
They generally fall into one of the following categories: % They generally fall into one of the following categories:
\begin{itemize} % \begin{itemize}
\item Scientific Failure: When there are issues regarding % \item Scientific Failure: When there are issues regarding
safety and efficacy that must be addressed. % safety and efficacy that must be addressed.
The preeminient question is: % The preeminient question is:
``Will the drug work for patients?'' % ``Will the drug work for patients?''
%E.Khm, Gupta, etc. % %E.Khm, Gupta, etc.
\item Strategic Failure: When the sponsors stop development because of % \item Strategic Failure: When the sponsors stop development because of
profitability % profitability
%Whether or not the drug will be profitiable, or align with % %Whether or not the drug will be profitiable, or align with
%the drug developer's future Research \& Development directions i.e. % %the drug developer's future Research \& Development directions i.e.
``Will producing the drug be beneficial to the % ``Will producing the drug be beneficial to the
company in the long term?'' % company in the long term?''
%E.Khm, Gupta, GLP-1s, etc. % %E.Khm, Gupta, GLP-1s, etc.
\item Operational concerns are answers to: % \item Operational concerns are answers to:
%Whether or not the developer can successfully conduct % %Whether or not the developer can successfully conduct
%operations to meet scientific or strategic goals, i.e. % %operations to meet scientific or strategic goals, i.e.
``What has prevented the the company from being able to % ``What has prevented the the company from being able to
finance, develop, produce, and market the drug?'' % finance, develop, produce, and market the drug?''
\end{itemize} % \end{itemize}
It is likely that a drug fails to complete the development cycle due to some % It is likely that a drug fails to complete the development cycle due to some
combination of these factors. % combination of these factors.
%
%
%USE MetaBio/CalBio GLP-1 story to illuistrate these different factors. % %USE MetaBio/CalBio GLP-1 story to illuistrate these different factors.
\cite{flier_DrugDevelopment_2024} documents the case of MetaBio, a company % \cite{flier_DrugDevelopment_2024} documents the case of MetaBio, a company
he was involved in founding that was in the first stages of % he was involved in founding that was in the first stages of
developing a GLP-1 based drug for diabetes or obesety before being shut down % developing a GLP-1 based drug for diabetes or obesety before being shut down
in . % in .
MetaBio was a wholy owned subsidiary of CalBio, a metabolic drug development % MetaBio was a wholy owned subsidiary of CalBio, a metabolic drug development
firm, that recieved a \$30 million -- 5 year investment from Pfizer to % firm, that recieved a \$30 million -- 5 year investment from Pfizer to
persue development of GLP-1 based therapies. % persue development of GLP-1 based therapies.
At the time it was shut down, it faced a few challenges: % At the time it was shut down, it faced a few challenges:
\begin{itemize} % \begin{itemize}
\item The compound had a short half life and they were seeking methods to % \item The compound had a short half life and they were seeking methods to
improve it's effectiveness; a scientific failure. % improve it's effectiveness; a scientific failure.
\item Pfizer imposed a requirement that it be delivered though a route % \item Pfizer imposed a requirement that it be delivered though a route
other than injection (the known delivery mechanism); a strategic failure. % other than injection (the known delivery mechanism); a strategic failure.
\item When Pfizer pulled the plug, CalBio closed MetaBio because they % \item When Pfizer pulled the plug, CalBio closed MetaBio because they
could not find other funding sources; an operational failure. % could not find other funding sources; an operational failure.
\end{itemize} % \end{itemize}
%
The author states in his conclusion: % The author states in his conclusion:
\begin{displayquote} % \begin{displayquote}
Despite every possibility of success, % Despite every possibility of success,
MetaBio went down because there were mistaken ideas about what was % MetaBio went down because there were mistaken ideas about what was
possible and what was not in the realm of metabolic therapeutics, and % possible and what was not in the realm of metabolic therapeutics, and
because proper corporate structure and adequate capital are always % because proper corporate structure and adequate capital are always
issues when attempting to survive predictable setbacks. % issues when attempting to survive predictable setbacks.
\end{displayquote} % \end{displayquote}
%
From this we see that there was a cascade of issues leading to the failure to % From this we see that there was a cascade of issues leading to the failure to
develop this novel drug. % develop this novel drug.
%
%
% I don't think I need to include modelling enrollment here. % % I don't think I need to include modelling enrollment here.
% If it is applicable, it can show up in those sections later. % % If it is applicable, it can show up in those sections later.
%
%
\end{document} \end{document}

Loading…
Cancel
Save