From 56a89717aba6645044fdbb2dd0d62157c39f7c63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: will king Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:27:40 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] outline of story and ending of presentation --- Presentation/outline.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Presentation/outline.txt diff --git a/Presentation/outline.txt b/Presentation/outline.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..af15199 --- /dev/null +++ b/Presentation/outline.txt @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +Intro + +Why do we care + +Possible stories: + sep 2019 + 2020 - 3 near misses with ISS (https://www.jpost.com/science/international-space-station-nearly-struck-by-chinese-satellite-debris-684809) (https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/pdfs/odqnv24i3.pdf) + May 2020 - Fregat tank breakup (left debris from 1000 to 6000 miles in altitude) + May 2021 - Canadarm2 got hit (https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/iss/news.asp, part way down) + Nov 2021 - Dodge debris from anti-satellite test in 2007 (China) (Jerusalem post above) +Nasa releases a + + +Why should we care? + - All orbits are subject to some degree of polution. + - Common uses: GPS, Military Communications, Commercial internet and TV. + - Exploratory uses: R&D of pharmaceuticals, exploration. + - Collisions and debris damage are to some degree inevitable. + +What is different now: + - Launch costs (https://aerospace.csis.org/data/space-launch-to-low-earth-orbit-how-much-does-it-cost/) (https://fortune.com/2017/06/17/spacex-launch-cost-competition/) + - Cubesats/nanosats (numbers at https://www.nanosats.eu/) + - in short, accessability. With lower cost per mass to orbit, more reasons to go. With lower development costs, easier to build many small satellites. This gives us a need for urgency. + + + +major points + - Summaries of results so far. + - Request for suggestions on utility functions that might be worth investigating + - Discussion of goals + - Investigate pigouvian taxation, cleanup bonds, etc. + - Standardize interface so it is easy to estimate results. + - + - Discussion of other work that should happen + - Estimation of parameters (simulation, bayesian, calibration, best guesstimates, etc) + - Rights of way work (way to get operators to declare a no-move value?) + - + +Other sources +Historical breakup events: https://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/pdfs/odqnv23i1.pdf +Breakups: https://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/pdfs/odqnv25i1.pdf +Newsletter on debris breakups: https://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/